Legislature(2001 - 2002)
2002-03-04 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2002-03-04 House Journal Page 2461 HB 254 The following was read the second time: SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 254 "An Act relating to the teachers' retirement system, the judicial retirement system, and the public employees' retirement system and to the tax qualification under the Internal Revenue Code of those systems; amending the definition of 'actuarial adjustment' in the teachers' retirement system and the public employees' retirement system; repealing certain provisions of the teachers' retirement system and the public employees' retirement system; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page STA RPT 6DP 2358 FN1: ZERO(ADM) 2358 FIN RPT CS(FIN) NT 10DP 1NR 2430 FN1: ZERO(ADM) 2431 Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 254(FIN) "An Act relating to the teachers' retirement system, the judicial retirement system, and the public employees' retirement system and to the tax qualification under the Internal Revenue Code of those systems; amending the definition of 'actuarial adjustment' in 2002-03-04 House Journal Page 2462 the teachers' retirement system and the public employees' retirement system; repealing certain provisions of the teachers' retirement system and the public employees' retirement system; amending the statutory limitation on payment of warrants to make an exception for warrants making benefit payments or refunds under various state retirement and benefit programs; and providing for an effective date." There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that CSSSHB 254(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSSSHB 254(FIN) was read the third time. Representatives Stevens, Bunde, Hudson, and Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that they be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and the members were required to vote. The question being: "Shall CSSSHB 254(FIN) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSSHB 254(FIN) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 37 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Bunde, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Fate, Foster, Green, Guess, Halcro, Harris, Hayes, Hudson, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Lancaster, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Williams, Wilson Excused: Dyson, Masek, Whitaker And so, CSSSHB 254(FIN) passed the House. 2002-03-04 House Journal Page 2463 Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSSSHB 254(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.